• arrow74@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        24 days ago

        True, but 1,000 years ago it sucked a lot more. Now we have some advantages. Even access to the internet is a good quality of life improvement compared to 1025 CE.

        So maybe instead 1,000 years the inequality still exists, but technology has made things a little nice for the working class. It’s all about perspective.

        Or the climate crisis and subsequent environmental collapse lead to a Mad Max hellscape

        • LeninsOvaries@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          24 days ago

          1,000 years ago it sucked a lot more

          1000 years ago we didn’t have a surveillance state, climate collapse, tiktok, 4chan, drone strikes, school shootings, car accidents, car dependent infrastructure, pollution smog, microplastics, fox news, subscription services, hiring AI, police robots, the gig economy, leafblowers, overdraft fees, airbnb, overseas concentration camps, white phosphorous, fracking…

          • Zetta@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            24 days ago

            Yeah, there’s a lot of bad, but he’s right. On average, the vast majority of humanity is significantly better off than we were a thousand years ago.

            • LeninsOvaries@lemmy.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              24 days ago

              Africa is struggling to recover from colonisation. The middle east is a warzone. The Americas and Australia are being occupied by invaders. Europe is in financial crisis. I don’t really know about east Asia. Even Antarctica is melting. Capitalism is worse for the worker than feudalism.

              • ThunderclapSasquatch@startrek.website
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                14 days ago

                Oh come on, only America and Australia are occupied? Where did your ancestors evolve? Who did your ancestors take their land from because they took it from someone

                Edit: for the record I’m indigenous but your argument is flawed and narrowsighted

    • voracitude@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      You really don’t see what’s happening around you?

      Let me just make sure we’re on the same page with a little maths problem: you have nine people and a Nazi eating dinner at the table together. How many Nazis are at the table?

      • aidan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        With what you said 1. Someone doesn’t have to be a good person, or be right, to coexist. Sitting at the same table as Pol Pot or Hitler isn’t enabling them.

        • voracitude@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          24 days ago

          Unfortunately this is incorrect as far as these ideologies go. They’re fundamentally incompatible with the principles of a free democratic society and so cannot be tolerated by anyone who claims to uphold the values of a free democratic society. If claim to uphold those values, and you’re sitting at the table with those people: No you fucking don’t. “Good person” and “correct” do not enter the equation at any point.