Text:

I consent to Plex to: (i) sell certain personal information (hashed emails, advertising identifiers) to third-parties for advertising and marketing purposes; and (ii) store and/or access certain personal information (advertising identifiers, IP address, content being watched) on my device(s) and share that information with Plex’s advertising partners. This data is used to deliver personalised ads and content, ad and content measurement, audience insights and product development. Your consent applies to all devices on which you have Plex installed. You can withdraw your consent at any time in Account Settings or using this page.

Soure: https://www.plex.tv/vendors/ (Might have to clear cache)

Can also read about the changes here: https://www.plex.tv/about/privacy-legal/

  • Selfhoster1728@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    21 days ago

    I don’t know why everyone in the selfhosting community still even mentions Plex or uses it.

    It’s closed source, not free; Jellyfin is a no brainer yet people still go to Plex??

      • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        21 days ago

        I bought a Plex pass for 90 or something. I officially dropped Plex about 4 months ago now. For 90 bucks I got something like 8 years out of it. I’ll call that a win, I don’t feel like I wasted my money, I don’t feel like I overpayed. Just moving on now.

      • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        21 days ago

        what? It’s not like everyone needs to run jellyfin at home. the only thing you need to use is the jellyfin webapp, which I don’t understand how is it more complicated than netflix or any other similar service. you log in, pick a movie and hit play. that’s it.

      • non_burglar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        21 days ago

        I don’t mean to diminish your comment, but I just went through the setup process for both Plex and jellyfin (moving to new hardware) and there was no significant difference between the setups.

        Maybe this wasn’t the case a few years ago, but jellyfin is just a setup, point to libraries, and enable hardware accel.

          • non_burglar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            21 days ago

            Yep. My son lives in another city and uses my jellyfin server. Actually since yesterday, because Plex stopped allowing him to watch remotely.

              • non_burglar@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                21 days ago

                Sorry, I meant “Plex took away free remote streaming”.

                You’re being really, really snippy. Either have a coffee or take a breather, but calling strangers liars is way offside.

                I’m not lying, I can show you my Fw config. My son called me yesterday saying he couldn’t watch Plex, something about the Plex pass. I just changed the Fw rule DST nat mangle port and told him to use jellyfin. The user is local, so that’s dead easy. Done in 10 minutes.

                And yes, most users don’t have this kind of experience, granted. But Plex comes with its own stupidities, like in 2020 when my wife had to pay $5 for the Plex app so she could access our library. Or the exercise of sharing libraries if you don’t have a Plex pass, which is a real pain.

                But that wasn’t my point. I was trying to relay that jellyfin isn’t as buggy and difficult as a lot of self hosters claim.

          • jagermo@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            21 days ago

            My Jellyfin tunnels via traefik and cloudflared. However, the normal Android app somehow can’t login, but streamyfin works like a charm. I always had issues with plex, because it relied on their own service. But jellyfin now simply works, pretty nifty

      • FundMECFS@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        21 days ago

        Jellyfin is basically as easy to use as plex within the same network. I’ve set up both dueing the past 6 months. The only big difference is that Jellyfin is much more of a pain to work through port forwarding.

    • bread@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 days ago

      Here’s why I still use Plex: for me Jellyfin hasn’t been easy to work the way I want it to. I mostly access my media on an Nvidia Shield, and the Jellyfin Android TV app just refuses to play certain videos; I can play them if I use VLC as an external player, but not within the app itself. The more pressing issue is that Jellyfin just refuses to play 5.1 audio, and downmixes everything to stereo. I have other issues, but these are the ones that prevent me from using it.

      For me Plex just works.

    • akilou@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      Jellyfin is hardly a no-brainer. I set it up out of curiosity a few weeks ago and my first question was how do I give access to my friends and family. So I searched, and all of the results were talking about setting up a VPN or a reverse proxy or whatever. Man, I just want to tell my mom “install this app on your tv and log in”, which is exactly what Plex does.

      I get that Plex is enshittifying, but pretending Jellyfin is a drop-in replacement is delusional.

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        21 days ago

        Jellyfin is a no-brainer. Publishing services on the Internet is complex.

        • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          20 days ago

          If they adhered to somewhat modern security principles for their Backend I wouldn’t mind hosting it behind a reverse proxy. But since large parts of the API is unauthorized and unprotected, I wont.

          And I do not plan on supporting family and friends in setting up vpns on all of their devices

          • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            20 days ago

            What are the worries behind it? Last time someone was worried about the security it was about knowing filenames of the stuff you host by brute forcing iirc

            • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              20 days ago

              Last time someone was worried about the security it was about knowing filenames of the stuff you host by brute forcing iirc

              Knowing (guessing) the file path allows them to access and stream the content. Meaning worst case scenario… Sony (the people known for putting malicious stuff on CDs) can probe your server, and prove the content is there because your server will return the movie file itself.

            • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              20 days ago

              The issue is their approach to security. I don’t trust them to properly secure their software, since they have proven to prefer client compatibility over security.

              • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                20 days ago

                Understandable. I don’t worry that much myself since I haven’t heard anything bad happening yet. And with ro rights to media, potential damage at least should be pretty limited.

                • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  20 days ago

                  You’re in a post about people outraged about an opt-in anonymous data sharing option on Plex, and you’re not worried about known security issues because you haven’t heard of anything bad happening yet?

                  Make it make sense.

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        21 days ago

        Seconded it’s not a no-brainer. I spent days trying to get it set up with Docker on two different computers and three different distros. It wouldn’t install, if it did install it had errors, if it would even open at all with anything other than a black screen. Hours trying to search how to fix it. I gave up and installed it as a standalone app on a common distro. Not as convenient, but FML it finally worked. Really felt like I wasted my time. Personally, this is the exact bullshit linux fanatics completely ignore when they insist on how great linux is vs whatever. I’ve got a shitload of patience, willpower and modest skill to try to get something like this working, but 99% of the population doesn’t. That’s why linux will stay on the back burner. And if it ever becomes just as easy as Windows…guess what? You’ll have many of the same problem as Windows.

      • cecilkorik@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        21 days ago

        I just want to tell my mom “install this app on your tv and log in”

        I mean, if I didn’t know better, I’d start to suspect that the large multimedia corporations building walled gardens of apps in closed Smart TV ecosystems don’t really want you to be able to easily tell your mom how to watch shit for free. I mean they’ll let you, if you really insist on having that app available, but someone will have to pay THEM money instead first (and probably let them spy on you). That’s their racket.

        The reason Plex can do it is because they do make money, doing shitty stuff like this to their users, so they can use that money to open these doors into SmartTV-land. The root of the problem is that your SmartTV itself (and your mom’s) is a locked down proprietary piece of shit, designed exclusively for shoving all proprietary content these media companies develop down your throat, and there are few convenient workarounds that are available to us, because of course they make workarounds as inconvenient as possible.

        Unless you’re willing to ditch everything proprietary and insist on open technology for everything, which is hard on its own, you’re going to end up with a janky mix of proprietary and open systems that always require some compromises, because the proprietary stuff forces us to compromise. It’s literally a “this is why we can’t have nice things” situation.

        • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          20 days ago

          Or… You know… Jellyfin could make it so I don’t have to setup elaborate VPN schemes and have every user install that on every one of their devices. For example they could fix their security issues to make it safer to expose JF through a reverse proxy, bug they refuse to not break client compatibility

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        20 days ago

        and all of the results were talking about setting up a VPN or a reverse proxy or whatever. Man, I just want to tell my mom “install this app on your tv and log in”,

        This is why I use Yunohost. It makes all of that just a “click buttons” affair. Then you can tell your Mom the same thing. Only the domain is yours so Jellyfin can’t hold it over your head.

      • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        So I searched, and all of the results were talking about setting up a VPN or a reverse proxy or whatever.

        The best thing is, you can’t use a reverse proxy with it, it doesn’t even support it.

    • Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      Until jellyfin adds better user log in plex will still thrive. I do the self hosting I don’t want a call every few days about they can’t log in. The one click Gmail login with plex is amazing.

        • foggy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          21 days ago

          The whole anti Google holier than thou is annoying at these levels.

          Ok fine, don’t use Google. But telling your friends and loved ones to switch email providers over your crusade is worse than vegans telling you about their diet.

          I’m all for kicking Google to the curb. I’m not for shoving my beliefs down other people’s throats.

          • hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            21 days ago

            It’s not “shoving my beliefs down other people’s throats” telling them that these are the options for signing in the service I’m hosting

              • dezmd@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                21 days ago

                No ma’am, this is a Wendys drive thru.

                But really, I think you misunderstood the intended inference from OP, it has nothing to do with email and everything to do with data collection, algorithms, and not quite fair use media access that get’s logged to Google (a third party) ad infinitum.

                • MudMan@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  21 days ago

                  I don’t know that Google gets to log your access in that scenario, Plex is just using their login system.

                  Plex sure does know, though, whether you log in via Google or not, so “I don’t share videos using google to log in” is still a bit of a weird statement and not the reason you’d be worried about your piracy habits.

                  Incidentally, if a friend or family member is hosting a service and “tells me these are the options to sign in to the service I’m hosting” I’d tell them to go away, which is something my own relatives have done to me a bunch when my proposed self-hosted alternative isn’t perfectly smooth and just as convenient as the corpo alternative.

                  Not surprisingly, the only two selfhosted things my family has ever used are Plex and Home Assistant.

    • defunct_punk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      For me it’s PlexAmp and the few tech-illiterate friends I have who use my server for video streaming. 99% of the time, I just watch movies on my desktop with VLC player but I’ve yet to find a self-hosting music player half as good as PlexAmp

      • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 days ago

        Yeah, the sad reality is that Plex’s setup experience is much smoother. And when you’re trying to convert people, the single largest obstacle is often social inertia. So lowering the barriers to entry is extremely important. My mother-in-law would need to sideload the Jellyfin app onto her TV, but Plex is available right on its app store.

        Luckily, you can run both side by side. Jellyfin for me and my more tech-literate friends, Plex for those who don’t know/don’t care to learn.

        • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          21 days ago

          I have read many people say this, but I don’t understand what they mean by it. When I set up Jellyfin, it was a very simple process.

          • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            21 days ago

            Apparently all your friends and family are comfortable with hostnames and ip addresses. Not everyone’s are. Also, not everyone wants to buy a static ip or setup a dynamic dns service or similar. Plex is definitely simpler. I have used both.

            • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              20 days ago

              Apparently all your friends and family are comfortable with hostnames and ip addresses.

              I mean pretty much everyone I know uses web browsers and sometimes type in web addresses lol

                • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  20 days ago

                  I doubt they’re thinking at all if writing a web address is too much lol

                  “Facebook dot what? Stop the tech speak, nerd!”

  • Soliae@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    21 days ago

    Jellyfin is the way. Costs nothing other than the hardware needed and nobody is selling anything about you.

    Our personal streaming library with Jellyfin is bigger than any public service and we can add to it from VHS, DVD, Blueray, though extra equipment was required for the VHS/Blueray.

    It’s also available anywhere we go and we can set up separate accounts for different family members. There’s even a phone app.

    • Joe@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      But not Fire tablets (kids profile) or Samsung TV or many others that Plex currently supports.

      JellyFin android phone app’s UI is a little weird at times, but does work pretty well for me.

      What I would adore from any app would be an easy way to upload specific content and metadata via SFTP or to blob storage and accessible with auth (basic, token, or cloud) to more easily share it with friends/family/myself without having to host the whole damn library on the Internet or share my home Internet at inconvenient times.

      Client-side encryption would be a great addition to that (eg. password required, that adds a key to the key ring). And of course native support in the JellyFin/other apps for this. It could even be made to work with a JS & WASM player.

      • ddash@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 days ago

        Checkout 3rd party jellyfin android apps. Findroid is working pretty well. Theres another one called Streamyfin which is catching up and a third one called Fladder, which is maybe a bit too early in development.

    • Eheran@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      How big is that library supposed to be that it is larger than all public ones? There are some with 10’000s of videos.

      • Soliae@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        We have over 15,000 videos in TV episodes, alone. Not counting movies.

        So…yeah.

  • flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    21 days ago

    content being watched) on my device(s) and share that information with Plex’s advertising partners

    That is a honey pot rights holders will be falling over themselves to pay Plex for access to once they hear about it.

    Been telling anyone that would listen that they need to get out of Plex since they implemented that first iteration of trying to require you to sign into your own self hosted server with a Plex.tv account. They were telegraphing what direction they were going in with that kind of user hostile move.

    Lots of responses about how it was easy to get around so no big deal (or worse that they liked it for some coping mechanism reason) and that nothing else was as easy and feature rich as Plex so it was worth it.

    Well now a few years down the road from that they are now going to use that beach head on everyone’s Plex server they can to collect what is being watched and sell it to the highest bidder.

  • mrpollo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    19 days ago

    The downfall of Plex needs to be compiled into an 80 minute YouTube video with sponsors spaced in for NordVPN and Viagra

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    Aww come on guys, my JF boner can only handle so much /s

    Seriously though, why did they even give you the option to disagree, you know they’re just going to force it 3-6 months.

  • ᕙ(⇀‸↼‶)ᕗ@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    “enshittification wont happen to my software of choice”

    hahahaha… those ppl with discord, iphones, windows,plex…they wont learn.

  • Xanza@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    Seeing the replies in this thread it kinda makes me wonder what Plex actually has to do for these zealots to quit using their platform.

    Like do they literally have to steal naked pictures of you and pass them around the office? Like wtf.

    • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      You can literally click “I do not agree” lol. Also the “personal data” is a hashed email (so they don’t get your email), ip address, and watch history. Not very “personal”, and not anything that violates your privacy or is of any concern to you.

      • moriquende@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        20 days ago

        If you connect to the internet from 2 or 3 different locations, the hashed email will be the same, so they just need to compare the locations to those from another service like Instagram and they know who you are and what you’re streaming.

        • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          20 days ago

          And? Why should we care? If I’m already using instagram and other social media platforms that we all know do this, I am clearly ok with it aren’t I?

          • moriquende@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            20 days ago

            Companies want your money. The more they know about you, the more possibilities they have to get it. You don’t know what the political landscape may look like down the road. You may feel safe now, but that can change quickly. Imagine you suddenly need to pay back money to the copyright owners unless you can prove you already did?

            • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              20 days ago

              And just like that we’re at silly made up hypothetical situations to drive fear and an agenda. That’s not even worth entertaining.

              Btw these changes and the data that is shared/sold are only for plex’s hosted movies and shows - not your personal media collection.

              We do not and will not collect information about content or titles in your personal media library or what you’ve played.

              Personal media users: we do NOT, and will not, share or sell any information about the content and titles on or your use of a personal media server.

              Source: link in the OP

              • Don_alForno@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                20 days ago

                And just like that we’re at silly made up hypothetical situations to drive fear and an agenda. That’s not even worth entertaining.

                It’s all hypothetical until it isn’t anymore. You’re literally the slowly boiled frog.

                • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  20 days ago

                  So how long before you admit you’re wrong? If they don’t sell it in 2 years? 5 years? 10 years?

                  You’re literally spreading FUD based on your paranoia.

  • moseschrute@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    Just downloaded Jellyfin! Been a Plex user for years. Noticed they’ve stated to add a lot of crap to the Plex interface. I just want to stream my media library. I’m a little disappointed that Jellyfin doesn’t have a native Apple TV app, but SenPlayer looks really nice and their price model is a one time fee. So no subscriptions!

  • Luca@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    21 days ago

    Can someone clue me in on the reason why anyone would prefer Plex instead of Jellyfin?

    • Zoidsberg@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      The lack of a PS5 app makes Jellyfin useless to me. We have a dumb TV with no casting ability so the PlayStation is our media box.

  • nix98@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    19 days ago

    I’m a big fan of Jellyfin. I would say it is easily family approved. That is for my family in my household who is using it on our home Wi-Fi.

    But I am not about to expose it publicly. I have WireGuard set up on my immediate family’s devices and that is mostly ok (until you get on a public Wi-Fi that fails because you haven’t gone through their portal and can’t because the vpn is on, or you are on an airplane’s Wi-Fi with no internet trying to watch their movies and it doesn’t work until you turn off the vpn). Explaining this to my wife has been a nonstop battle.

    I’d like it open it up to my siblings families, especially because I have the ersatztv plug-in to create approved child stations, but so many smart tvs and devices don’t support a vpn. How have others handled that situation?