• zecg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 days ago

        The users must ask themselves if they’re the product, fucking Musk is paying for access to them.

        • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          20 days ago

          Not really. It just group chats and some are used as news feeds.

          Its one of those terrible UX where people force a tool to do something it’s not supposed to like Discord for forums etc.

          Its basically used for piracy and drug markets for tech illiterate but somehow caught on.

    • NotKyloRen@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      I don’t know why people stuck with it. I’ve used it; I get that a lot of the initial success/hype was:

      • It’s not owned by Meta
      • “Putin hates Durov!”
      • “Unlimited” storage (lots of people using it as free cloud storage, which is dumb if you value your files)

      But your messages are not E2EE by default (only “Secret Chats”, which aren’t synced across devices)…Telegram (the organization) could always read your messages. I said this so many times and got called everything under the sun.

      “Why would they care about my messages though?” ------> Because $300 Million.

  • REDACTED@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    So, a software that is owned by US politician is working together with software that has links to Russian government?