Yes, if Tailscale on your router is advertising routes, and your other devices while connected to Tailscale are picking up those advertised routes, they won’t be able to figure out how to get to your local network devices if both things are advertising the same routes.

You’re an amateur user. Engineering teams need long term and stable distributions with frequent security updates to be stable for long periods of time. That is why LTS releases exist.

The only interaction Windows would have with a Linux partition is fudging the boot record. If it’s booting to emergency mode, you likely got a bad update. It should give you the option to boot to a previous working kernel if you hold down the shift or an arrow key while booting to grub. Just pick a previous known good version and start repair from there.

How so what?

Let me pick this apart piece by piece because you don’t understand how any of this works, and for your uninformed answer from AI or Reddit:

1. A Trademark is nothing more than branding. Meaningless. The substance of the project is MIT Licensed which means…open.
2. As you can read in their Charter docs: “Many basic decisions are made through a process known as “lazy approval”, in which general consent is assumed unless valid objections are raised within a period of time…” So, no, Red Hat as an entity isn’t making decisions in the direction of the project.
3. Fedora ecosystem is one group of devs working on a specific line of tooling centered around rolling releases. Alma and Rocky have their own, which is mostly a free version of RHEL focused on LTS releases (not desktop). Two factions of the same coin with different goals.
4. In Fedora forums you’re wondering why Fedora people would suggest Fedora Server??? See #3. They have completely different use-cases and userbase.

Tailscale is a group of clients on a Tailnet which are all equal, unless you tell it otherwise. That means you need to set the client you installed on your router as a subnet router.

Even then, if you’re not familiar with networking, you’ll probably have duplicate routes if you’re not paying attention. The other option is to just install Tailscale on each server you want access to.

👍

Your default routes are being set incorrectly. If you’re using it as an exit node, then you need to make sure it’s only being used as such for other clients on the Tailnet. You also need to make sure you’re splitting your routes correctly so that the default route on your router isn’t set for something on the Tailnet.

Generally speaking, if you’re not familiar with networking and routing, you don’t need to change the subnet settings if using a Tailscale client on your router. You also shouldn’t be advertising routes from it for your own network, or else you could end up getting issues like you’re seeing because your routing tables will be broken while Tailscale is active.

One more thing: Tailscale on your router doesn’t make it a server, it’s still a Tailscale client. You still need to setup your routing in the Tailscale server to make sure it’s not duplicating routes like this.

No…systemd was controversial because it complicated an entire ecosystem and caused lots of growing pains for very little payoff at the time. SysV was fine for many, but now so is systemd, and it’s solved many growing pains for distro maintainers.

🙄

This dumb thread comes up every few years from paranoid people new to the community who don’t understand how this ecosystem works.

There are countless threads and blog posts about this, so I’m not sure why you’re bringing your paranoia here to kick up some fear mongering or whatever your intent is, but let me break it down for you:

1. Fedora is its own entity
2. Red Hat is a for-profit company
3. Red Hat doesn’t own Fedora
4. Red Hat contributes assets to many FOSS initiatives, not just Fedora
5. Yes, some RH employees also work on Fedora. It’s free contribution. Same as Canonical, Valve, IBM, Universities, and other private companies.
6. There is nothing to be “weary” of because if something were to change about the Fedora ecosystem that didn’t benefit users, guess what? There will be instant forks, and a massive shift away from that community. Red Hat knows this because they aren’t fools.
7. People aren’t “shilling” for Fedora. It’s the new standard for well-built and easy to run distro since Canonical decided to ruin Ubuntu (see point #6)

Red Hat EMPLOYS many contributors straight out of open source projects, and also just directly funds projects they want to see improve. So do other corporate entities. You know Redis was basically single-handedly funded by Amazon for multiple years so the project would upstream features they requested? Also many Apache projects, memcached, ELK, Grafana…etc.

Get outta here with the shit-stirring for absolutely no good reason 🤦

Model of the machine or the NIC/WiFi module would be useful.

Are you sure you can? Did you look up the model number and check for manuals or docs?

It looks like it might be under the black plastic cover to the left of the RAM, or under where you have it placed in your picture. Then again, it could not be accessible from this side of the main board, and you might have to look under the keyboard.

Manual would be better than guessing though.

It depends on the use-case. If this VPS doesn’t have layer7 routing out in front, you have a service that needs to respond from an A/CNAME hostname in combination with an SRV lookup, you have service that uses bidirectional TLS 1.2…etc.

There’s all kinds of reasons you may need multiple static IPs for an instance. If youre just using vhosts for HTTP capable services, don’t worry about it though.

“Old PC” meaning what, exactly? Need some specs.

In general, a Qnap or Synology box is going to be much lower wattage than a full PC.

Lol, okay, bud. Not only are you absolutely wrong and seem to have no professional experience with this whatsoever: search engines, engineering blogs, Wikipedia, history, and every other known source of truth on this disagree with you, yet here you are arguing anyway. Amazing. 😎

Yes, Windows sucks. What’s your question?

Your machine isn’t shutting down, it’s trying to sleep.

You also have active KVM instances which are fighting to keep it alive.

Run a LiveUSB of anything else. If it works, install that instead.

Stop listening to AI.

Okay, well it doesn’t NEED to be Docker Desktop for sure. There is just a difference in the configurations of how it works, but whatever Desktop can do, docker-ce can do.

For starters, let’s find out why you can’t install drivers. Do you have an error?

It will with Tailscale though, as OP mentioned using. Tailscale clients reach out to DERP endpoints to create the routes they need to communicate with other clients. dNAT wouldn’t matter.

Source: don’t this with Tailscale vanilla and Headscale