

The use of “self-hosting” is a little confusing here. To be clear, he wasn’t self-hosting his video. It was published on YouTube, and the guidelines and procedures in question are Google’s.
Edit: I’m not defending Google’s actions. It’s just that the title gave the impression that a video he had self-hosted was somehow subject to “community guidelines”, which didn’t make sense.
Edit 2: Ten downvotes in less than an hour, on a clarification comment? Wow. I’m disappointed to see that level of targeted negativity here. What rotten behavior. :(
On Debian Bookworm with the non-free-firmware repo enabled…
$ apt-cache pkgnames firmware | sort
firmware-amd-graphics firmware-ath9k-htc firmware-atheros firmware-b43-installer firmware-b43legacy-installer firmware-bnx2 firmware-bnx2x firmware-brcm80211 firmware-cavium firmware-cirrus firmware-intel-graphics firmware-intel-misc firmware-intel-sound firmware-ipw2x00 firmware-ivtv firmware-iwlwifi firmware-libertas firmware-linux firmware-linux-free firmware-linux-nonfree firmware-marvell-prestera firmware-mediatek firmware-microbit-micropython firmware-microbit-micropython-doc firmware-misc-nonfree firmware-myricom firmware-netronome firmware-netxen firmware-nvidia-graphics firmware-nvidia-gsp firmware-qcom-media firmware-qcom-soc firmware-qlogic firmware-realtek firmware-samsung firmware-siano firmware-ti-connectivity firmware-tomu