The Trump administration is preparing to cancel a large swath of federal funding for California, an effort that could begin as soon as Friday, according to multiple sources.

Agencies are being told to start identifying grants the administration can withhold from California. Sources said the administration is specifically considering a full termination of federal grant funding for the University of California and California State University systems.

Singling out one state for massive cuts would be an unusual move, but Donald Trump has long made Democratic-led California a target.

    • N0t_5ure@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      7 days ago

      That would break the bank. California is 4th largest economy in the world, after the U.S., China, and Germany. It would probably cause Trump to declare martial law and send troops to California.

      • miguel@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        41
        ·
        7 days ago

        I mean, good luck? CA is also obscenely well defended, since most of its modern wealth came from it being considered a battleground vs Japan and Russia, so there’s loads of bases.

        Most likely, this will just yet again be a defeat in court. That dude is just throwing shit against the wall and hoping some of it will stick.

        • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          7 days ago

          You’re assuming Trump wouldn’t also fuck over troops stationed here in California. Remember military personnel are reliant on local infrastructure in a lot of areas and if Trump starts fucking with it again the military may be caught in the crossfire.

          • miguel@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            7 days ago

            I’m assuming the comment “declaring martial law” would require nat guard (natives) and stationed troops (federal) to attempt to impose order. Not sure what that has to do with local infra, but the last time they tried that (LA Riots) it didn’t go great. Doing it for a strictly political reason would likely result in some very hard decisions for a lot of nat guard and some federal career military. The Nat Guard and federales couldn’t even restore order in South Central when most of the state was in their corner, it’d be madness to think they could handle the whole state when it was over a pissing match.

            California gets roughly $162.9 billion from the fed. California pays roughly $692 billion to the fed in taxes.

            It’d be pretty easy to see them choosing to just withhold whatever Trump decided to deny them and say “fine, then we’ll just make up the offset, suck it”, and then things would get interesting indeed.

            • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 days ago

              I thought ya meant that because of how militarized the state was it’d be hard for the state to respond. I was just stating you could cut water and electricity as a response to that.

              But yeah you are right on the fact the response would at best be a mess, honestly if they were told to occupy the state they’d probably just sit around getting heat stroke and doing nothing.

      • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Yeah but how the fuck would he pay the troops without, you know, California’s money?

        I maintain the quickest way for military and LEOs to drop support for Trump is realizing they aren’t gonna get paid or that their money has become essentially worthless. Either scenario will pit them against him. If they can’t feed their families they will turn, considering it’s an all volunteer military. He would have to instate a harsh draft first to avoid that.

        • N0t_5ure@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          7 days ago

          realizing they aren’t gonna get paid or that their money has become essentially worthless.

          If California’s taxes suddenly evaporated, it would create a massive budget deficit that would have to be plugged by printing money, would debase the currency and likely cause hyperinflation.

          • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            Which would render the US dollar essentially worthless, resulting in soldiers and LEOs essentially being “unpaid” and no longer willing to support Trump.

            • N0t_5ure@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              Maybe, maybe not. What you have to consider is that when you are in the military, the federal government owns you like livestock. They feed you, house you, and can send you to your death. You don’t necessarily need money, especially in the short term. Moreover, there are rules that prevent active duty military from being ejected from housing. You might not be happy about dollar devaluation, but the blame will be focused on the “bad” people of California and you’re there to make it right. It would take a lot for the U.S. military machine to grind to a halt, and a lot of damage can be done while it is happening.

              Another common idea is that the good folks in the military aren’t going to shoot civilians, and would rebel if ordered to. While there might be some isolated rebellion, most people in the military are conditioned to follow orders, and will do so, even if such orders are illegal. People will do what they have to to keep the pressure off themselves.

              • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 days ago

                You don’t necessarily need money, especially in the short term.

                If you have kids, you do. Plenty of people in the military with spouses and children.

                • xylol@leminal.space
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  the trick is to have them shoot their kids especially if they live in california with them then they wont feel bad for not getting paid to shoot their kids

      • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Start cutting power, water, and gas to federal offices and facilities, let’s see if they can do jack shit when it’s 90 degrees outside and 110 inside. Mind you that is just me thinking reconciliation is stupid and shouldn’t be considered as a possibility.

    • Skyrmir@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      That’s the problem California doesn’t send taxes to the Federal government. People and businesses pay directly to the government. There’s no mechanism to even stop it on a state level if a governor wanted to.

    • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      I was wondering about this. The new BBB or whatever increases SALT to 40k. I live in Jersey. I would have no problem with NJ just taxing me 40k outright. You just pay 40k to live in NJ. And then I just deduct that 40k from my federal tax burden, bringing it down below 0. What’s stopping states from doing this?

      • Skyrmir@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        The irs wouldn’t recognize the deduction and you would still owe the entire amount to the federal government.

        • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          I’m curious why you say this, and I’m not trying to be argumentative. I pay 11k for property taxes, and so with this I get to deduct that 11k from my federal taxes. And if you mean to say that the IRS and the Feds would be like hey, you can’t do that, yeah, you’re probably right, and I agree. I’m just curious if you had some other rationale for the suggestion. I am no tax expert.

    • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Remember, the state doesn’t pay taxes, individual citizens do by filling out their annual federal income taxes.

      So, if “California” were to stop giving money to the federal government, the governor would basically need to convince individual citizens not to file their 1040.

      And all of those people would have to clinch their assholes and hope Trump didn’t sick the IRS on them.

      • Match!!@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        Presumably California would declare that they wouldn’t comply with IRS investigations but those people would be vulnerable if they travel or have assets outside California

  • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    So Americans need to switch it off and on again. Gather up new founding fathers and mothers, write up a new constitution and declaration of independence - write up documents for a new federation between states…

    Create a back up United States. Declare the old one null and void. Stop interacting with the old one. Start interacting with the new one.

    Call all this something benign sounding. Try not to go to war about it. But yeah, you all need to switch this shit off and on again.

    • PattyMcB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      I’m pretty sure Texas is the only “legal” state allowed to secede, but I’m not a lawyer and my info may be woefully out of date

          • entwine413@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            That’s irrelevant to whether or not a state has an established legal right to do a thing.

        • blitzen@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          The colonies weren’t “allowed” to leave England either, yet here we are.

          Would it cause a civil war? Yea. Would California win? Of course not.

      • Tower@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        No, Texas (nor any other state) can not secede from the Union.

        https://www.sll.texas.gov/faqs/can-texas-secede

        Can Texas secede? I heard it is one of the only states that can secede from the United States.

        It is a common misunderstanding that Texas has the right to leave the United States. The Texas State Library and Archives Commission (TSLAC) addresses this on their page about Texas’s annexation:

        It is said of Texas (and, occasionally, Vermont) that it received a letter or document of permission to withdraw from the Federal Union if it so chose. […] In fact, Texas received no special terms in its admission to the Union. Once Texas had agreed to join the Union, she never had the legal option of leaving, either before or after the Civil War.

  • 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Wow, so I thought I was fucked when I had “California secedes” on my bingo card

  • pleasegoaway@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    The University of California is the largest employer in the state.

    In most other states, Walmart is the biggest employer.

    Talk about giving higher education the middle finger!

  • PattyMcB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Aren’t there a fuckload of Republicans in wine country?

    I doubt they’ll be happy about that

    • blitzen@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      There’s repugnigans everywhere in California. There’s just more Democrats.

      I wouldn’t say there are more Republicans in wine country than any other agricultural region in the state. Probably slightly fewer.

  • motor_spirit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    these stupid fucks love pissing in the wind for all of us to see

    go on then ya citrus scrotum, show us once more how brilliant and clever you are