- 0 Posts
- 14 Comments
NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.worldto News@lemmy.world•Jonathan Joss death: Police backtrack on hate crime denial21·18 hours agoYou have, though. This whole rhetoric is just an extension of that. We see you.
NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.worldto News@lemmy.world•Jonathan Joss death: Police backtrack on hate crime denial2·19 hours agoYou’re an institutionalist, and a condescending asshole, I’ll take your hate over your praise any day. Go lock step and lick some more fucking boots.
NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.worldto News@lemmy.world•Jonathan Joss death: Police backtrack on hate crime denial5·19 hours agoYou’re right, there is no perfect answer so we should just do nothing and allow the cops to do whatever the fuck they want and give them immunity for everything. If we can’t have it absolutely perfect every time then we should just let things go to their worst possible situation, right? Otherwise we’d have to accept that the system isn’t perfect.
Go fuck yourself you stagnant kowtowing twat.
Edit: Yes, SWAT is a tactical response team trained for these specific situations. Way to point out that we actually already have these units ready to be used, you god damned idiot.
NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.worldto News@lemmy.world•Jonathan Joss death: Police backtrack on hate crime denial3·20 hours ago911, and ideally they would alert a tactical response team with a negotiator to get on a helicopter while they gather details and form a plan in transit that would reflect their training for these situations. Have four of these teams in each state. police cordon off the area and monitor the situation to keep the team updated while they are in transit and to watch the entrances and exits while the staff that were already in the building, including resource officers, would be doing what they could to get people away or get them to the safest place they can. Police force as an intervention would be a last resort scenario, as escalation in these situations will only guarantee more dead. The police have no obligation to protect or serve under the current laws, they are not required to do fuck all, they should not be the people you expect to save or help you, they only exist at this point to punish you and bind you.
NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.worldto Gaming@lemmy.world•If you hear Latin, you're in trouble.English1·20 hours agoSpider-Man is one of the few games that I loved the long drawn out battles in, they made the combat in those games so much fun, and it made it feel like a proper comic book superhero fight.
NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.worldto World News@lemmy.world•World won’t forget Tiananmen Square, US and Taiwan say on 36th anniversary of massacreEnglish62·2 days agoJesus Fuck, you tankies are god damned children with your logic. More than one thing can be, and in fact are and have been and will be, bad while other things have happened that are also just as bad, if not worse, while not diluting other events, you get that, right? There is more than one atrocity you should be aware of throughout history and every government has been objectively fucking awful, stop sucking so much authoritarian dick. You fuckers are kowtowing cowards.
NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.worldto News@lemmy.world•Supreme Court allows AR-15 ban in Maryland1·3 days agoWe’re actively eating our own face off, as a country, because we refuse to even taste progress.
NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.worldto News@lemmy.world•Supreme Court allows AR-15 ban in Maryland2·3 days agoI used to think along the lines of the Churchill quote of “Americans can always be trusted to do the right thing, once all other possibilities have been exhausted.” Turns out that was giving us way too much credit.
NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.worldto News@lemmy.world•Supreme Court allows AR-15 ban in Maryland69·4 days agoSo, let’s just do nothing about guns? Just give up and let public shootings happen as an unavoidable fact of life, but only for the U.S?
NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.worldto News@lemmy.world•Supreme Court allows AR-15 ban in Maryland1·4 days agoCheck yourself before you wreck yourself. Uvalde, Sandy Hook, Las Vegas, Orlando, Virginia Tech (handguns, but guns are guns), I could go on, all purchased their weapons specifically for the purposes of what they did with them. The people you are talking about tend to be the most responsible and respectable owners of guns, statistically. City folk with a history of mental instability and their freshly purchased assault weapons are overwhelmingly the problem, not people that were raised around guns used for hunting animals and taught to respect and safety use them from the time they could hold one.
NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.worldto World News@lemmy.world•Pro-Israel Figures Threaten to Kill Greta Thunberg Over Gaza Aid Mission - Quds News Network (2025-06-02)English2·5 days agoIf you do a holocaust then you’re not one of the good guys. It’s pretty simple.
So that they can have a back door to as many private computers as possible.