

Can something be good and also a marketing tactic?
Can something be good and also a marketing tactic?
If they are using the data that has been perpetuating this for a while now, they don’t have a single source for the percentage given.
It does say NEW STUDY though, so I could be wrong.
I recently watched a YouTube video about this exact percentage, I’ll try to find it and link it.
I think it’s also good to remember that, creators who bake in their sponsorships are USUALLY paid upfront for the space.
Meaning, just skip that shit if it’s not for you. They already got the money.
At least, this is how I have come to understand sponsorships.
I know nothing of their ethics, but PornHub looking like it’s made for a 2009 iPhone will always steer me to Xvideos
Well it wasn’t Israel that conducted the survey, it was a group working with the university of Pennsylvania.
She’s done more than you ever will, so she’s got that going for her.
I’m trying to understand your point, but I’m a little lost here.
Do you mean the way the public reacted to their ad?
Or the way they capitulated to that reaction?
I mean: Yes racism and sexism are pervasive in our society, but using Ben and Jerry’s (operating under the same racism/sexism) as an example; they do heavy marketing tactics toward LGBTQ but they are also an ally.
Does them utilizing that make them bad?