Ⓐ☮☭

  • 0 Posts
  • 34 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 20th, 2023

help-circle




  • webghost0101@sopuli.xyztomemes@lemmy.worldAI revolution
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    56
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I dont want to pick a fight but i hope people who upvote this while believing everything ai is bad reflect on the fact that this meme was made using ai.

    My point is ai is often used in bad ways but not automatically and pointing out proper use exists gets people angry.




  • My job has a yearly thing and i would want to go but while at large the company is very open and inclusive they tend to forget such when planning these.

    If you do this, you must organise them well. I am autistic and the mental challenge of Figuring out whether an event is compatible with me. (Where do i need to be, what are we doing, how much people/noise will there be, when will i be back home) is often more straining and time consuming then just doing my job.

    Also a bit beyond topic but a small indie gaming company should not have a dedicated CEO. Creative works genuinely do not benefit from corporate structures. But that is my opinion.












  • This is correct.

    This is a flaw i had considered and never found a solution for. Hence the idea is unfinished.

    The only further argument i have is that manipulating camera techniques is as old as film yet it’s the digital tools that are causing the most harm and allow any troll to partake. Staging a scene takes at least some dedication and effort.

    If such would be considered on the blockchain than it would also bring in questions all other footage by the same recorder device. “Wallets” from established authors, anonymous or not would have their own reputations of trustworthyness.


  • Not at all. I consider journalists the best potential of early adapter.

    As a consumer i don’t care if i have to copy or screenshot or need to list sources if i am Just sharing to friends.

    Publishers however have a responsibility towards the public to provide fair information. And if i post publicly i also try to pay a bit more attention. (Ignoring i failed exactly that just earlier today)

    There would be nothing stopping anyone to ignore the system and keep sharing unverified pixels but its a real flex be able to provide open and transparent information about your sources almost upfront.

    If enough established organisation start doing this then the ones that don’t will stick out like they have something to hide.

    The exposé is an interesting example I had not yet considered but again i think nothing is stopping publishers from publicly stating they cannot provide sources but have the means to get it independently verified.

    I also believe its possible for a camera/recorded to exist anonymously on the blockchain, just like you don’t know the owner of a crypto wallet.