Where as we know our money is ours

I agree with the sentiment of your comment but you should look into this. You don’t really own money that is in accounts.

You don’t pay any commission

In the same way that Google and Facebook are free.

Especially because of the fact plenty of them are rigged.

Arguably the safer bet if one wants to gamble is stock investing

Haven’t you seen Wolf of Wallstreet? How do you avoid paying commissions and how do you get information before the big players have already cashed in?

Easy. It’s a long name but you can rename onedrive accordingly.

Like the other comment says, it must be the New START treaty, but I am no expert. It seems like it’s a Russian excuse for their carelessness however some parts of the treaty were respected so I think Putin and Trump had some topics to clarify.

On 21 February 2023, Russia suspended its participation in New START.[8] However, it did not withdraw from the treaty, and clarified that it would continue to abide by the numerical limits in the treaty.

On 2 June 2024, the United States revoked visas of Russian nuclear inspectors, describing this step as a “lawful countermeasure” to Russia’s “ongoing violations” of the treaty.

So some parts of the treaty must have been considered active.

On 1 June 2025, Ukraine claimed to have destroyed more than a dozen nuclear strategic bombers, including two Tu-160, at airfields deep inside Russia with swarms of small drones. The bombers were still parked not in nuclear strike protective bunkers, but in open-air, according to obligations under the New START Treaty with the US.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_START

He can legally be president for a third term

Has the law already been changed?

The issue is that because of nuclear treaties between USA and Russia, Russia is required to park their nuclear bombers out in the open. If USA wants Russia to keep them out in the open, they had to make a good argument.

They evaluate reality with other priorities. To them it seems like they are doing good.

Almost all cruelties are committed for the greater good. People just disagree on what is good.

if it were the same, you wouldn’t have been allowed to make this comment.

It works both ways. Is OP allowed to make the comment because he is more priviliged or because he has less power and is less of a threat?

Remember the McCarthy era. There can be more restrictions if needed.

Developed by Xerox and Canon in the mid-1980s, the existence of these tracking codes became public only in 2004.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printer_tracking_dots

The proprietary backdoors come with spies doing much more gymnastics to gain access to those who know the secrets to access those backdoors.

Thanks for letting me know.

Seems that I am out of my depth because I cannot imagine what France could do militarily. I would assume that any ship would be vulnerable if Chinese aircraft missiles have a longer range than the French ones so that France cannot defend their ships with their aircrafts.

Which is wrong. Fines have to be linked to income and they must hurt or they are just a tax.

Have you forgotten project 2025?

Has Pakistan shot down the French jets? India hasn’t confirmed those losses. If true then France doesn’t have much power to project.

On 7 May, Indian and Pakistani fighter jets battled for over an hour. Pakistan claimed that three Dassault Rafales, one MiG-29, one Su-30MKI fighter jet, and one Israeli-manufactured IAI Heron UAV belonging to the Indian Air Force were shot down. If true, would first time that a French-origin Dassault Rafale has been lost in combat, reportedly having been shot down by the Chinese-origin Chengdu J-10. This, along with the performance of Chinese-origin PL-15E missiles in the combat, reportedly gained global attention.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_India–Pakistan_conflict

All the downvotes, what’s wrong with my comment?