i have a foolproof strategy to protect them. they should just broaden the target base by immersing themselves among other rich people.
and the most effective method would be making everybody else equally rich. bam. you’re now only one potential target among eight billion.
my ted talk will be aired soon.
my biggest question around her is how many margarets did she actually end up thatching?
“Actually Indians”.
q. Which is the best Stallone franchise? Rambo?
a. Naw! Rocky!
but this article espouses that llms do the opposite of logic, planning, and reasoning?
quoting:
Claude, on occasion, will give a plausible-sounding argument designed to agree with the user rather than to follow logical steps. We show this by asking it for help on a hard math problem while giving it an incorrect hint. We are able to “catch it in the act” as it makes up its fake reasoning,
are there any sources which show that llms use logic, conduct planning, and reason (as was asserted in the 2nd level comment)?
but there’s been significant research and progress in tracing internals of LLMs, that show logic, planning, and reasoning.
would there be a source for such research?
this article is why secondary sources (and beyond) are important.
the op is just an assertion made by cbc with no sources (credible or otherwise) whatsoever.
… bunch of douchebag techbros thinking it’s going to solve all the world’s problems with no side effects…
one doesn’t imagine any of them even remotely thinks a technological panacaea is feasible.
… while they get super rich off it.
because they’re only focusing on this.
who the fuck is going to buy anything that’s endorsed by my ugly mug?