Well, for now, I haven’t seen Austria do anything to start WWIII
no thoughts, only froggo
- 5 Posts
- 43 Comments
hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto You Should Know@lemmy.world•YSK: Non-violent protests are 2x more likely to succeed and no non-violent movement that has involved more than 3.5% of a population has ever failed4·3 hours agoI don’t really know if I’d consider the French revolution very succesful, considering the fact that the Bourbon dynasty was restored after only 16 years.
hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto You Should Know@lemmy.world•YSK: Non-violent protests are 2x more likely to succeed and no non-violent movement that has involved more than 3.5% of a population has ever failed9·3 hours agoI’d say that being distruptive is what we should be discussing about. Strikes or boycotts, when organized well, can be examples of non-violent can actually work, while holding a sign in a park doesn’t do anything.
hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•Is it okay for gay people to call ourselves homophobic slurs?3·7 hours agoYou can reclaim slurs. Of course, ability to read the room is very useful, because in some settings using slurs, even if you’re referring to yourself, isn’t considered acceptable, like you don’t swear if you’re talking to kids or having dinner with your granparents.
hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto You Should Know@lemmy.world•YSK: Non-violent protests are 2x more likely to succeed and no non-violent movement that has involved more than 3.5% of a population has ever failed9·8 hours agoAnd now in June, we celebrate the queer community’s liberation, which totally happened by walking up to a politician and asking “hey can we please not get assaulted and thrown into prison or a mental ward for existing? 🥺”, to which the politician responded “oh, I’ve spent my entire life thinking you guys were perverted mentally ill sinners that should be drawn and quartered, but sure! ☺️”
hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto You Should Know@lemmy.world•YSK: Non-violent protests are 2x more likely to succeed and no non-violent movement that has involved more than 3.5% of a population has ever failed4·8 hours agoOh, but it’s use of force and not violence when we do it!
hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto You Should Know@lemmy.world•YSK: Non-violent protests are 2x more likely to succeed and no non-violent movement that has involved more than 3.5% of a population has ever failed6·8 hours agoAlso I’d say that peaceful and violent aren’t binary. Like, there’s standing somewhere holding signs without being distruptive, then there’s civil disobedience like blocking traffic without being actually violent, then there’s protests where protestors will use violence to defend themselves if they have to without actively seeking to engage in violent acts, and then there’s straight up rioting, where people go out their way to attack people, or smash windows or burn cars and shit.
And, of course, it varies from person to person. If there’s protest X happening, one person could think of is as violent (or call it violent as a way of propaganda) while one person wouldn’t.
hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto You Should Know@lemmy.world•YSK: Non-violent protests are 2x more likely to succeed and no non-violent movement that has involved more than 3.5% of a population has ever failed555·8 hours agomy fucking ass 👅🥾
Bolsheviks, Stonewall riots, suffragettes, all famously peaceful movements that got their rights by staying on their knees and asking nicely.
hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•What's an unexpected skill you have?4·3 days agoIn this economy?
And that exterminator truck too.
hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto memes@lemmy.world•Live long enough to see yourself become the villain9·4 days agoHe never was not a villain.
Nope. Me doomscrolling for hours is very much not satisfying at all. It’s just boredom (combined with existential dread and overstimulation).
a good chunk of them would also suffocate and people would be very angry at you