41·
15 hours agoI can imagine, because it’s almost always true of chronically Western libs parroting State Department buzzwords. Not really beating the allegations here.
Name one country that doesn’t assume authority.
- 0 Posts
- 15 Comments
Joined 4 years ago
Cake day: November 16th, 2021
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
I deliberately did that to basically demonstrate Western chauvinism in its rawest form. It’s greater magnitudes more fucked up than anything chauvinists blab about. Also what the fuck is California lol.
insert burger index goodness report here
The Enlightened Centrist has entered the chat!
Of course you focus on women because that’s the desirable group of objects of which you most desire, so you project your desires on to “helpless”, “hapless” women who need your “civilized” and “noble” ass “saving” from these “dirty barbaric orcs”.
Every state has authority over its citizens but some of them let women drive
Women can drive in Iran.
not have to stay covered up
As opposed to Europeans depriving women of their dignities and forcing them to stay as uncovered as possible?
Dear white people of France: being forced to undress wasn’t exactly the liberation I was longing for
Palestinian women detail Israeli sexual assaults in Kamal Adwan raid
unable to move around or do anything eithout a man
Iranian women can move around freely, it was definitely a much bigger case then for sure, but nowadays it’s literally a non-issue…
don’t support child marriage.
As opposed to western “Divine Secular Absolutism”? Real funny looking words you got there, when stringed together.
Authoritarianism is a dumb, useless and meaningless term, when you understand that every state assumes authority (name me one country that doesn’t assume authority, therefore isn’t “authoritarian”).
1979 happened because you libs couldn’t stop trying to meddle in Iran’s affairs.
Coulda saved spared us from the dogwhistle by just saying “they’re not white”.
what’s unbelievable about it
Yep, pretty much, I didn’t feel like putting it into words, so thanks for this. I’d add that arguably, when students “play the game”, they get the same flack, or worse, than job applicants who exaggerate or straight up lie in their resume the same way companies lie about free unlimited PTOs, job security, a clear career ladder, etc.
Using morality or honesty as an argument against students who cheat is an attack on students, a distraction from the fact that this shit doesn’t work the way it was advertised actually, which has been internalized and normalized in many societies, left uncontested, which is big bad.
in short: captalism lol.
slightly longer: captialism. lmao.
“I am often left with a choice between soliciting participation where students are merely the deadpan voice boxes of hallucinatory AI slop, or silence,” the Philadelphia teacher despaired. “Which am I supposed to choose?”
ChatGPT isn’t its own, unique problem. It’s a symptom of a totalizing cultural paradigm in which passive consumption and regurgitation of content becomes the status quo," Nathan Schmidt, a university lecturer and managing editor at Gamers With Glasses, told 404.
Seems to be easier to blame students for understandably responding to rote-practice, monotonous factory-work oriented slopfest curricula with slop, rather than actually addressing the core issue at hand.
You’re taking the USA as an example
So? How is it not comparable to other Western countries? The original post already fucking exemplifies why censorship is a staple of the West, not just the US. Swear to god libs like you don’t actually have an argument to make and resort to moving goalposts to make up for it:
etc. etc.
Sure, it is, but my point is that it’s less restricted.
And that point is pointless because “less” restrictions only apply to small groups of people.
That’s just a massive lie. Notice how organized groups like the AfD, the National Rally, Renaissance etc… still exist but any smaller scale organization of people that threatens imperialism get squashed ASAP:
https://www.commondreams.org/news/richard-medhurst
https://electronicintifada.net/content/switzerland-deports-eis-ali-abunimah/50337
https://www.newarab.com/news/pro-palestine-supporters-losing-jobs-over-gaza-solidarity
https://www.commondreams.org/news/ice-warrant-mahmoud-khalil
Saying such things as “bad arabs/muslims are dirty terrorist scum and need to be wiped off the map these russian orcs need to be wiped off the planet” would clearly get you in trouble
[citations needed]. I assure you that the most “trouble” libs faced was a slap on the wrist.
🤣 thanks for exposing yourself as nothing but a vibes-based liberal. Hasn’t even produced a single shred of evidence either.
I just have this feeling like you get persecuted for speaking against the government in countries like China, whereas you need to be a strong figure to have the same fate in other countries.
I have no data and this is just a feeling.
We can learn and take away a lot from this vibes-based, “democracy” virtue-signaling analysis, but not about the topic at hand.
This is still a cool way to downplay the West’s imperial staple of suppressing activism, engages in revisionism and amplifies everything that helps liberalism, all while accusing everyone outside the imperial core of doing so (or doing worse) as well, the statement along the lines of “does worse” doesn’t mean anything when you recognize that it’s a Western idea fully embraced and embroidered by the West that is insurpassable/incomparable to any other form of censorship.
Freedom of speech is a meaningless concept, especially so for anyone that’s not white, when you can’t actually criticize EU/US/KKKommonwealth countries within these countries meaningfully without fear of losing your job, your house, your visa (this is exacerbated for foreigners, often not talked about) or your life.
https://www.commondreams.org/news/ice-warrant-mahmoud-khalil
Your “freedom” to “speech” and “democracy” are constrained within a clearly drawn boundary, the boundary of which is drawn by the ruling class.
Any other country outside the West engaging in censorship is either a) a dog of the West or b) protecting itself from fully succumbing into being a dog of the West.
Notice how a Westerner does not risk anything by truly believing in and expressing things like “china censorship bad arabs/muslims are dirty terrorist scum and need to be wiped off the map these russian orcs need to be wiped off the planet”, but a non-Westerner risks absolutely everything by even slightly hinting at a criticism towards Western imperialism/wanting better conditions at the cost of the ruling class, perhaps even in their own damn fucking country, this is where point a) comes in to play.
When it comes to China, they fall squarely in b):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LAEwoYIYgJA
Once you understand the asymmetry, it becomes a lot clearer why the “both sides” argument is just a feeble attempt at minimizing Western imperialism.
well said, i wish eurolibs would get this through their head, but i’m wishing for too much
sources? or vibes?
The developer claims the tool is for cops, but anyone can sign up and use it for targeted harassment.
so in other words: the developer claims the tool is for those whose entire job is to engage in targeted harassment, but anyone can sign up and use it for targeted harassment.
Very cool, very impressive stuff. Definitely won’t be used against already censored, suppressed minority groups.
amazing, we have child sex defenders in chat now. I was hoping it would go without saying that child sex, regardless if it’s between two children, is wrong. But when it’s enshrined in your “civilized” laws, suddenly it makes it ok.
I’m not even going to entertain this further by conceding that Iran’s marriage and consent laws are horrible, because they are and it goes without saying, and it’s something that needs to be worked on stat. Take your disgusting, vile Westernophile shit out of here.