Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · edit-29 days agoIf AI was going to advance exponentially I'd have expected it to take off by now.message-squaremessage-square64linkfedilinkarrow-up116arrow-down12
arrow-up114arrow-down1message-squareIf AI was going to advance exponentially I'd have expected it to take off by now.Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · edit-29 days agomessage-square64linkfedilink
minus-squarejustOnePersistentKbinPlease@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up1·9 days agoAnd the single biggest bottleneck is that none of the current AIs “think”. They. Are. Statistical. Engines.
minus-squaredaniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·8 days agoMaybe we are statistical engines too. When I heard people talk they are also repeating the most common sentences that they heard elsewhere anyway.
minus-squareCaveman@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·8 days agoHow closely do you need to model a thought before it becomes the real thing?
minus-squarejustOnePersistentKbinPlease@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up1·8 days agoNeed it to not exponentially degrade when AI content is fed in. Need creativity to be more than random chance deviations from the statistically average result in a mostly stolen dataset taken from actual humans.
And the single biggest bottleneck is that none of the current AIs “think”.
They. Are. Statistical. Engines.
Maybe we are statistical engines too.
When I heard people talk they are also repeating the most common sentences that they heard elsewhere anyway.
How closely do you need to model a thought before it becomes the real thing?
Need it to not exponentially degrade when AI content is fed in.
Need creativity to be more than random chance deviations from the statistically average result in a mostly stolen dataset taken from actual humans.