• AstralPath@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    Honestly, I’ve always thought the best use case for AI is moderating NSFL content online. No one should have to see that horrific shit.

  • philpo@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    In the other news: Meta pays another 3 billion Euro due to not following the DSA and getting banned in Europe.

  • Ulrich@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    Well hey that actually sounds like a job AI could be good at. Just give it a prompt like “tell me there are no privacy issues because we don’t care” and it’ll do just that!

  • fullsquare@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    moderation on facebook? i’m sure it can be found right next to bigfoot

    (other than automated immediate nipple removal)

  • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    This might be the one time I’m okay with this. It’s too hard on the humans that did this. I hope the AI won’t “learn” to be cruel from this though, and I don’t trust Meta to handle this gracefully.

    • chrash0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      pretty common misconception about how “AI” works. models aren’t constantly learning. their weights are frozen before deployment. they can infer from context quite a bit, but they won’t meaningfully change without human intervention (for now)

  • henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Great move for Facebook. It’ll let them claim they’re doing something to curb horrid content on the platform without actually doing anything.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    I think AI is positioned to make better decisions than execs. The money saved would be huge!

  • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Meta:

    Here, AI. Watch all the horrible things humans are capable of and more for us. Make sure nothing gets through.

    AI:

    becomes SKYNET

        • HowdWeGetHereAnyways@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          No, they give you an answer that should sound correct enough to enable them to score a positive interaction.

          Why do you think so many GPT answers seem plausible but don’t work? Because it has very very little actual logic

          • And009@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 days ago

            Expecting current gen tool to be as smart as humans? Doesn’t mean they’re useless. They can translate words to images and explain art in terms of business.

            They add capabilities not replace.

            • leftzero@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 days ago

              They add capabilities not replace.

              They poison all repositories of knowledge with their useless slop.

              They are plummeting us into a dark age which we are unlikely to survive.

              Sure, it’s not the LLMs fault specifically, it’s the bastards who are selling them as sources of information instead of information-shaped slop, but they’re still being used to murder the future in the name of short term profits.

              So, no, they’re not useless. They’re infinitely worse than that.