• NGram@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yup, this is open weights just like DeepSeek. Open source should mean their source data is also openly available, but we all know companies won’t do that until they stop violating copyright to train these things.

    • LWD@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I figured as much. Even this line…

      M1’s capabilities are top-tier among open-source models

      … is right above a chart that calls it “open-weight”.

      I dislike the conflation of terms that the OSI has helped legitimize. Up until LLMs, nobody called binary blobs “open-source” just because they were compiled using open-source tooling. That would be ridiculous