weird@sub.wetshaving.social to memes@lemmy.world · 6 days agoMulti-track driftingsub.wetshaving.socialimagemessage-square26linkfedilinkarrow-up1697arrow-down112
arrow-up1685arrow-down1imageMulti-track driftingsub.wetshaving.socialweird@sub.wetshaving.social to memes@lemmy.world · 6 days agomessage-square26linkfedilink
minus-squareEmpricorn@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down1·5 days agoDo you think an obscenely wealthy individual owner vs a publicly-traded company owned by a group of them solves the fundamental issue?
minus-squarejumping_redditor@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down3·5 days agomakes it more of the owner’s personal choice, rather than having to come up with a justification to the shareholders.
minus-squaresfxrlz@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·5 days agoBut that’s good because wealth and power aren’t known to corrupt and change people right?
Do you think an obscenely wealthy individual owner vs a publicly-traded company owned by a group of them solves the fundamental issue?
makes it more of the owner’s personal choice, rather than having to come up with a justification to the shareholders.
But that’s good because wealth and power aren’t known to corrupt and change people right?