• sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    19 days ago

    I love when these clowns regimes come for the chidren but they didn’t do anything about the Catholic church.

    Bad faith behavior all around.

  • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    19 days ago

    Years ago the .xxx TLD was introduced for adult websites. If we’re going to regulate adult sites. Why not require them to use .xxx for their domains and let parental controls do the rest?

        • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          19 days ago

          That’s exactly a security concern from a design point of view. Your desire to trivialize it doesn’t change its nature, access control is access control. That’s not what DNS is for and making it do that is going to cause everyone regret.

          • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            19 days ago

            You’re not wrong. But if I had to pick between blocking .xxx on my kid’s device or uploading a photo of my ID to various porn sites, I know which one I’m choosing.

            • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              19 days ago

              “I want people to accept a bogus solution so this will all just go away.” Okay? But surely you can appreciate that people are not likely to be moved by your bad faith suggestions.

  • far_university1990@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    19 days ago

    It said the platforms also do not appear to be abiding by requirements for porn sites to use age verification tools to protect children from accessing adult content.

    Good, no implementation of this not privacy nightmare.

    It comes amid wider scrutiny of online pornography services worldwide, with many regulators looking to crack down on those that do not have age verification in place.

    HAHAHA good luck with 1 billion head hydra.

  • anamethatisnt@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    I honestly feel that this falls into parental responsibility. Both Android and iPhone comes with parental controls and the same is true for browsers on computers.
    Android example:

    iPhone example:

    It’s a search away to find step-by-step guides for this stuff, so you don’t even need to know how to do it yourself.

      • Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 days ago

        Uh ? What’s wrong about that ? These are basically generalized romeo&Juliet laws.

        The highlighted age is that from which a young person can lawfully engage in a non-commercial sexual act with an older person, regardless of their age difference. If a participant in a sexual act is under 18 but above the age of consent then sexual acts with another person who is at or over the age of consent may still be illegal if the older participant is in a position of authority over the younger person.

        Despite what the text says, here in France, being over 18 while the other person is not can often be enough to be considered in a position of authority btw

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      European here, they’re that low because our politicians fear they might piss off their pedophillic donors (rich white people), and many citizens think it’s like for a close-in-age thing.