• LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, down with the violence of the state! Although, to prevent bad actors and armed gangs we do need to have some sort of militia to protect the vulnerable from the greedy and cruel, human nature being what it is. And to prevent said militia from turning into the very thing it was supposed to protect us from, we need some sort of oversight, preferably from a democratically elected body, that tells the militia how to act and prevent them from violating the rights of the people. Oh wait I just reinvented violence of the state hehe.

    People in Somalia hearing that America has a 1.8% homelessness rate: “wow. Things are really just as bad over there.”

    • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s not what anarchists refer to as a state.

      A common anarchist definition of the state is: The institutionized power structure which alienates people from the businesses of their daily lives.

      If the whole constituency of the community that the militia protects is involved in controlling that militia, that’s not state violence anymore.